Skip to main content

The Immortalists Review


The Immortalists by Chloe Benjamin

~ Andrea Li 


[spoilers!]


Chloe Benjamin’s The Immortalists spans five decades following the lives of the Gold children: Simon, Klara, Daniel, and Varya. It starts in the year 1969 in New York City, where Daniel leads his siblings to see “the woman on Hester Street.” The rishika claims to know the day that anyone will die. One by one, each of the children has their fortune told by the old woman in a cluttered, messy apartment. No matter how hard they try to forget that day, the dates are ingrained into each sibling's mind for the rest of their lives.


The narration jumps to 1978 in Simon’s perspective. Their father Saul dies, and it is 16 year old Simon's job to take over the family’s tailoring business. Knowing he has an early death, Simon doesn’t want to waste his life suppressed, being someone he is not. He runs away to San Francisco with Klara, gets a job at club, becomes a ballet dancer, and comes out as gay. A new and unknown disease hits the city, and Simon dies of AIDS on the day the rishika predicted. Simon was grateful for the rishika, because knowing his early death inspired him to live out his life the way he wanted.


After Simon’s death, Klara expands her magic show, The Immortalists, to Las Vegas to reach a bigger audience. The stress of her baby and a tight performance schedule causes her to drink frequently and experience black outs. Klara becomes convinced her own magic is real and starts to hear knocks, assuming these are messages from Saul and Simon. Klara times the silence between them, using a code she uses for a magic trick, and it spells out “M-E-E-T M-E” over and over. Her mental state goes in a downwards spiral, and on the day the rishika predicted, she hangs herself, convinced that she's ready to “move on” with her life, to see Simon. 


The story moves 1991, following Daniel’s life in New York after he is suspended from his job as a military doctor. Daniel is the most haunted by his siblings’ deaths, because he blames himself for taking them to see the old woman. When a police investigator calls him for information on Klara’s suicide, Daniel becomes consumed with the possibility that Klara and Simon’s deaths being tied to the rishika. Could planting the idea of a day of death in people’s minds somehow trigger them to make it happen? Daniel loses his mind and embarks on a drive across the country to seek revenge and shoot the rishika on his death day. The police investigator trails him to the apartment and in the chaos, shoots Daniel first. 


Saul, Simon, Klara, and Daniel have all passed, leaving Varya and her mother as the only ones left in the Gold family. Influenced by how death seems to surround their family, Varya takes part in a 20 year longevity study to figure out how to make monkeys live longer. Varya seems to have OCD and is obsessed with cleanliness. After reconnecting with her long-lost son Luke, it is revealed that Varya has been restricting her own diet and refusing to have any personal connections to anyone, just as she has done to the monkeys. Luke’s anger at Varya wakes her up from her mindset that she has to give up enjoyment in order to live a longer life. This is clearly contrasted to the choices of Simon. 


The story wraps up leaving it unknown whether Varya dies on her predicted day. Still, the ending ties up all the loose ends that were traced throughout the novel. However, it leaves the reader with a sense of tragedy and sadness that the Gold siblings never got the final goodbyes they deserved. The book constantly pokes at the connection and lines between life and death, and reality and fantasy. There is an underlying question of whether telling someone the day they will die can influence their subconsciousness to somehow make it come true. 


I thought the book was captivating and profound, with eye-opening themes. There was a lot of good symbolism and interconnectedness throughout the novel, such as clear parallels between the lives of a seemingly disconnected family. I enjoyed how the takeaway of the book is not in the characters themselves, but for the reader to see from the overarching timeline of the whole family.


The book was a little bit dense and took me a while to read, but once I got into it the story was really interesting. I recommend this book for when you have time to get into something more heavy and deep, rather than a fun story to get through quickly. 


9/10 :)


Fun fact: I bought this book at an airport in Seattle!





Comments

  1. This book sounds really interesting! You did a good job explaining it even though it sounds really complicated. I like the idea of the book and the question of whether or not telling someone when they die can make it come true. The book does sound a bit dense a bit complicated, so you did a good job communicating that through the post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you did a good job with providing a description of the book and I think I got a pretty good sense of the characters described. I think the individual character stories sound really interesting and I find it pretty interesting how they seemed to take the news in different ways. I also find it pretty interesting that Simon, who had the earliest death date, seemed to have lived the most fulfilling life of the four siblings. Overall it seems like a very interesting book and you did a great job with the review.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice review, I'll be sure to check this book out, since it sounds pretty cool. I found it interesting on how Simon and Varya approached their death dates so differently, with one enjoying life to its fullest while the other tries to prolong it as much as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not usually into these kinds of books, but the descriptions of the characters and the plot have made me really want to read it. I'll definitely check this out.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why are villains ugly?

By Rose Benjamin In books and movies, antagonists/villains are often portrayed as hideous beast-like people. Of course, there are exceptions, but writers usually tend to make their villain's appearance match their behavior. This may be to add to the reader/viewer's perception of the antagonist as a villain, having less empathy towards them. Many antagonists are already generally bad people, however, so it shouldn't be necessary to have them look weird. I think it is more likely that villains' appearance is designed to scare a reader or viewer, creating a more immersive experience. Different stories have different reasons and backstories for their villain's appearance. One book published in 2004, The Legend of Holly Claus by Brittney Ryan, tells a story about Santa Claus having a daughter, which then awakens an evil warlock deep below the Earth. This warlock has been sealed inside a prison for a very long time, so it makes sense that he would be ugly. However, the n...

The School for Good and Evil Book Review

  By Ankita Bhargava (Spoilers for the first two chapters of The School for Good and Evil) The School for Good and Evil by Soman Chainani   revolves around two girls named Sophie and Agatha. They live in a small town, where every four years, two children are kidnapped by the School Master. Those children (one good, one evil) later show up in storybooks that mysteriously arrive in the village, after being taken to twin schools of good and evil. Sophie's dream is to be a Good princess, while Agatha is the perfect candidate for and Evil witch. However, when they are finally taken to the school, Sophie is taken to the School for Evil, while Agatha is taken to the School for Good.  I really liked this book because of the way that it immediately introduces the character's personalities, their flaws and their relationships with other characters. In the first page, we learn that Sophie wants to marry a prince and that she is a little conceited. It also introduces Agatha as her po...

Why Do Writers Use Pen Names?

By Andrea Li Pen names, also known as a pseudonym, literary double, or nom de plume, are made-up names adopted by an author that they use on their works in place of their real name.  A simple Google search reveals that a surprising amount of well-known authors use pen names, including J.K. Rowling, Stephen King, Lewis Carroll, and Dr. Seuss. Daisy Meadows, from the childhood-favorite and never-ending Rainbow Magic series, is disappointingly a collective pen name for the four different authors that wrote the books (it was too perfect to be true). Then for the opposite effect, you hear the name Rainbow Rowell and are inversely betrayed to hear that Rainbow Rowell, is in fact her real name. The next time you are wondering why famous people all have cool names, the answer is that they might not!  Pen names may seem like a surface level change and simply for aesthetic purposes, but pen names have existed for centuries and have historical significance. In earlier times, when women w...