Skip to main content

The Silmarillion Book Review

 By Ankita Bhargava

Contains minor spoilers for the Lord of the Rings trilogy and the Hobbit

A book that you've probably heard of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Another book that you may have heard of the Hobbit. A book that you may not have heard of is the Silmarillion.

The Silmarillion is a collection of stories written by JRR Tolkien about the world of Lord of the Rings, but edited and compiled into a cohesive story after his death. The book contains stories such as the creation myth of Middle-Earth, Sauron's predecessor Morgoth as well as some explanations for things that happen in Lord of the Rings, such as who Gandalf really is, and how the rings of power were created.

However, you don't need to have any knowledge whatsoever of either the Lord of the Rings or the Hobbit to read the Silmarillion! The book is able to stand on its own, with a distinct plot and storyline. The book doesn't reference anything from either the Lord of the Rings or the Hobbit, so you are able to completely enjoy the book if this is the first work by JRR Tolkien that you are reading. If you have read the Lord of the Rings or the Hobbit, there are still many characters that you will be able to recognize, such as Lord Elrond, or Sauraman. 

I would not recommend this book to people who did not enjoy Lord of the Rings. The way that language is used is not appealing to some people, and both books were written in a similar fashion. For people who have only read the Hobbit, that book was originally designed to be a bedtime story, and wholly unconnected to the rest of Lord of the Rings. As such, the writing and characters in the Silmarillion are very different from the ones in the Hobbit. I would also not recommend this book to people who are huge fans of first-person. This book was intended to act as a series of myths for Middle Earth, and so it has many passages like this:

"and a sound arose of endless interchanging melodies woven in harmony that passed beyond hearing into the depths and into the heights"

It sounds very pretty when it is spoken out loud, but it is quite ostentatious and less fun-sounding than either of his other books are. Compare that sentance to this, from the Hobbit:

"He liked visitors, but he liked to know them before they arrived, and he preferred to ask them himself."

I'd give the Silmarillion a 9/10. Overall, the stories were very engaging, and the author had a good mix of action, exposition and quieter scenes. However, the way he writes is very archaic and becomes confusing at times. JRR Tolkien also has a tendency to use a lot of characters, which does get confusing quickly. There were parts where I had to reread a section to figure out what happened, and especially in this book there are a lot of characters with similar names (Finwë, Fëanor, Fingolfin and Finarfin, to name a few). However overall, I really enjoyed this book, and I would recommend this book to anyone who is a fan of high fantasy.







Comments

  1. I remember reading this book in 6th grade and being confused from the beginning to the end. I quit halfway because there were too many characters to keep track of. However, I still think that the author did an excellent job describing the setting. I might pick this book up again this year. Nice review of the book!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have never heard of this book but it sounds really interesting! I like fantasy and I might read this book some time. I thought your point about language was really interesting. I think it is easier to read books with simpler language but the complicated language also helps with the setting. I also thought it was interesting that this book was written as a series of myths. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't know why, but this article makes me want to read The Hobbit and The Lord of The Rings, so that I can read this book. I know you said that's not necessary, but it just feels right. But, yes, this has definitely piqued my interest. It is interesting to find less well-known work by a well-known author, I think... Anyway, good job!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Introduction to the SCP Wiki (Karl)

    The SCP Wiki is an expansive public creative writing project housed on  scpwiki.com . The SCP Foundation (the Foundation) is a secretive fictional organization inside the SCP universe which contains thousands of people, objects, and places that have anomalous properties. These range from a cardboard box which origami dragons fly out of to a deer god that can turn any matter into a hexagonal column. The anomalies that the Foundation contains, how they are contained, and the stories linked to them are detailed in Special Containment Procedures, which take up the majority of the content on the wiki. Currently, there are six "series" of these procedures, each with a thousand articles.     If you go into a random article on the wiki, you will probably be overwhelmed by acronyms, numbers, and unfamiliar names. There are a few articles that detail what some of these things mean. Useful links are always provided in articles whenever they're mentioned. Object classes...

Why Do Writers Use Pen Names?

By Andrea Li Pen names, also known as a pseudonym, literary double, or nom de plume, are made-up names adopted by an author that they use on their works in place of their real name.  A simple Google search reveals that a surprising amount of well-known authors use pen names, including J.K. Rowling, Stephen King, Lewis Carroll, and Dr. Seuss. Daisy Meadows, from the childhood-favorite and never-ending Rainbow Magic series, is disappointingly a collective pen name for the four different authors that wrote the books (it was too perfect to be true). Then for the opposite effect, you hear the name Rainbow Rowell and are inversely betrayed to hear that Rainbow Rowell, is in fact her real name. The next time you are wondering why famous people all have cool names, the answer is that they might not!  Pen names may seem like a surface level change and simply for aesthetic purposes, but pen names have existed for centuries and have historical significance. In earlier times, when women w...

The Aid of Illustrations to Writing

By Rose Benjamin Illustrations in books, especially novels, can either be useful visual aid or unnecessary. Sometimes, the charm of the story is how the reader can envision the characters and setting themselves. When a character's physical appearance has little do with the story or the mood of the book, vague verbal descriptions (or none at all) are enough. Other times, however, visuals can help set the mood of the story and give characters personality. When the text already provides extensive description or properties of the environment are written to be vague, illustrations break the intent of the text, providing detail that should have been imagined by the reader. Unnecessarily showing how characters look can also ruin the reader's unique experience and make it more similar to everyone else's. People may have in their heads a certain design for a character, and be set on it. An illustration of said character would ruin their perception of the character, especially if the...